Reorganise India’s defence spending

Reorganise India’s defence spending

India has been the largest importer of defence equipment(उपकरण/सामग्री) for several years. It spends about 2.5% of GDP on defence, slightly(थोड़ा/दुर्बलता से) above the world average for such expenditure(खर्च/लागत). Yet, the army is short of men, especially officers, and of material.The army’s testimony(गवाही/शहादत) before the parliamentary panel on defence and the panel’s own recommendations(सिफारिशों/अनुशंसा), ranging from making a five-year stint(कार्यकाल/रोक) in the armed forces amandatory for would-be civil servants to invoking(प्रेरक/विनती करना) the intervention(हस्तक्षेप/व्यवधान) of the Prime Minister’s Office, are tinged with a sense of desperation(हताशा/निराशा), but lack a systemic approach.Action is required on multiple fronts. At 2.5% of GDP, defence spending is 2.5 times what the government spends on healthcare and 23% of the Centre’s tax collections. It is neither feasible(संभव/साध्य) nor desirable(वांछित/आकर्षक) to step up the defence outlay. The goal should be to get more bang(धमाके/गरजना) out of every defence buck. To raise the share of spending on the equipment needed for modern war fighting, it is necessary to rationalise manpower costs. This can go two ways. Defence pensions should go the way of civil service pensions, and be linked to contributions made while in service rather than to a defined benefit.

The government should offer a top-up to prevent the pension falling below a reasonable level. Simultaneously(इसके साथ ही,/एक साथ), the period of service of non-officer ranks should be brought down to the minimum required to optimise the return on spending on training raw recruits(नया सैनिक/नया सदस्य). The idea should be to provide in-service personnel training that would make them ideal members of a multi-skilled workforce sought after in civilian life, minimally dependent on pensions.Proper planning and coordination(समन्वय/तुक) can substitute domestic R&D and production for a sizeable chunk of imports. That would lower acquisition(कमाई/लाभ) costs. Scale is needed to bring down production costs. That calls for cooperative planning by all the three services.The reality of commissions and speed money favour imports over domestic manufacture. Political will must alter reality. India cannot play the role the world wants it to, with business as usual in defence spending.

 

Important Vocabulary

1.Stint(कार्यकाल/रोक
Synonyms: assignment, duty, job, spell, stretch
Antonyms: entertainment, failure, fun, pastime, stagnation

2.Bang(धमाके/गरजना)
Synonyms: smack, straight, abruptly, hard, head on
Antonyms: slowly

3.desirable(वांछित/आकर्षक)
Synonyms: beautiful, enticing,fascinating, adorable, alluringstar
Antonyms: repulsive, bad, detrimental, disadvantageous, disagreeable

4.Recruits(नया सैनिक/नया सदस्य).
Synonyms: draftee, newcomer, rookie, sailor, soldier
Antonyms:expert, professional

5.Acquisition(कमाई/लाभ
Synonyms: addition, gain, procurement, purchase, recovery
Antonyms: loss, failure, forfeit, surrender, dearth

6.Slightly(थोड़ा/दुर्बलता से)
Synonyms: kind of, lightly, marginally, somewhat, hardly
Antonyms: a lot, considerably, greatly

7.Feasible(संभव/साध्य)
Synonyms: achievable, advantageous, appropriate, attainable, beneficial
Antonyms: disadvantageous, implausible, impossible, impractical, improper

Print Friendly, PDF & Email